Why?

Moderator: Moderators

Why?

Postby spyderhunter » Thu Nov 19, 2015 9:23 pm

I've been reading many posts about the problems h-bodies have with handling issues and the many (fixes) that never really fix the problems. What exactly is it that makes these cars Not handle the way we know they should (or want)? Other small cars handle well and have short wheelbases and are narrow also. Why does this problem seem so hard to fix right? I have a 02 BMW 325xi wagon that handles really well ..... and it's a WAGON! No offense to the wagon owners...I had a monza wagon once. :D
User avatar
spyderhunter
 
Posts: 158
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 5:50 pm
Location: Bucksport, Maine


Re: Why?

Postby avewhtboy » Thu Nov 19, 2015 10:15 pm

The problems come from poor design of the front suspension from the factory. The caster camber ackerman and bump steer are all
not set up to get "optimum" steering geometry. The rear suspension is set up pretty well if you have the later torque arm suspension.

That's the short answer, how you go about correcting these things is where there is room for interpetation.
User avatar
avewhtboy
 
Posts: 573
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 11:06 am
Location: Stone Mountain Georgia

Re: Why?

Postby marco_1978_spyder » Thu Nov 19, 2015 10:17 pm

Most H body owners know the culprit....

it's that dang nut behind the wheel most of the time 8)
1978 Monza Spyder V8 4speed, posi
1978 Sunbird Formula V6, 5 Speed, Hatchback
1980 Sunbird Hatchback 4cyl, 4spd.
2006 Chevrolet Aveo 5 speed Hatchback
Yes, you can refer to me as Mark
Please visit my blog... http://chevymonza.blogspot.com/ Follow if you like!
Featuring special guests; Carl Beraytor and Ray D'atore

My Red spyder now has a youtube channel please Like and Subscribe!!!
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOzzSR ... ISuing7KLA
User avatar
marco_1978_spyder
Senior Moderator
 
Posts: 5283
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Western, New YorK / Rochester

Re: Why?

Postby spencerforhire » Thu Nov 19, 2015 10:18 pm

Personally, I think the H-body cars handle pretty well; at least compared to other mid 70's cars. Have any of you ever driven a Gremlin? or a Maverick? Or any Mustang previous to a Fox Body? All inferior to any H-body, as long as it had sway bars(like a Vega GT or Monza Spyder). The geniuses at GM hung a V8 engine waaaay too far out forward of the centerline of the front wheels and therefore made sure they would never handle like a true sports car.
I drove 1st gen Camaros for 6 or 7 years before I bought my first Vega; at the time I thought it was quite a step up.
There's been lots of discussion on here about how to solve the perceived "poor" handling with talk of "Ackerman" and "bump steer" and "scrub radius" and lots of other suspension tuning buzz works. As I see it, the best way to improve handling on one of our beloved H-bodies is to chuck out that cast iron small block lump and stick something light and powerful under the hood. Anything from an Ecotec 4 to a V8 LS from a Camaro or Corvette(or Trailblazer as well).
The "fleet"-
72 Vega HB Drag Car -383/'Glide/9"(9.35@146.19)(5.94@117.28 1/8th)
77 Vega Estate wagon- project(someday)will have TPI305/T-5, S-10 spindles/axles
76 Vega GT- 400/4spd/9" retired from active duty(rusty)
06 Silverado 2WD ex.cab daily
03 Silverado 2WD ex.cab (retired)
06 Haulin' 20ft enclosed car transporter
06 GMC Canyon Shop truck
07 Colorado project( 5.3 4L60e swap)
99 Saturn SL1- wife's car
01 Saturn SC2- son's project
07 Saturn Ion Redline project
and 4 more Saturn "parts cars"
Note- the very act of listing all of these has made me realize I have some kind of problem.....

Visit http://www.spencerforhire.ca
User avatar
spencerforhire
 
Posts: 2442
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 9:02 pm
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia

1972 Chevrolet Vega Hatchback

Re: Why?

Postby marco_1978_spyder » Thu Nov 19, 2015 10:33 pm

+1

spyderhunter wrote:I've been reading many posts about the problems h-bodies have with handling issues and the many (fixes) that never really fix the problems. What exactly is it that makes these cars Not handle the way we know they should (or want)? Other small cars handle well and have short wheelbases and are narrow also. Why does this problem seem so hard to fix right? I have a 02 BMW 325xi wagon that handles really well ..... and it's a WAGON! No offense to the wagon owners...I had a monza wagon once. :D


isn't it sort of hard to say definitively 'how these cars handled' ? I've run basically old junk around a local scca course and scored up with the front gunner's in my class. But what does that even mean, other than a fun day I had.

The cars were engineered from the factory to handle the corners, potholes and steep driveways on grandma's way to the grocery store, not the scca circuit. The sport models were just a bit more taught. Just enough to please the buyer and still not upset grandma over rough road's. The rest was up to the owner and the springs and swaybar kit's sold by ieco and dobi back in the heyday. And then the tire issue. 13's are an issue. I had a very well worn 79 spyder that had an ieco kit, and 215 60 14's all around and handled exactly the way I wanted and no oil pan-to-pavement issues.

And remember, a porsche is a porsche, of coursche, of coursche.
1978 Monza Spyder V8 4speed, posi
1978 Sunbird Formula V6, 5 Speed, Hatchback
1980 Sunbird Hatchback 4cyl, 4spd.
2006 Chevrolet Aveo 5 speed Hatchback
Yes, you can refer to me as Mark
Please visit my blog... http://chevymonza.blogspot.com/ Follow if you like!
Featuring special guests; Carl Beraytor and Ray D'atore

My Red spyder now has a youtube channel please Like and Subscribe!!!
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOzzSR ... ISuing7KLA
User avatar
marco_1978_spyder
Senior Moderator
 
Posts: 5283
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Western, New YorK / Rochester

Re: Why?

Postby Kenova » Thu Nov 19, 2015 11:05 pm

My first H-body was a '77 Astre, purchased used in October '77.
I also owned a '75 Camaro at the same time.
I found the handling of the two very comparable, although a little different probably because of the difference in weight.
They did however suffer from the same problem, undersized tires.
The only time my 4 cyl. Vega is really fun is when I'm throwing it through corners on the highway.
It still needs more tire. :mrgreen:

Ken
My other car is a Nova.
User avatar
Kenova
 
Posts: 1641
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Why?

Postby bugdewde » Fri Nov 20, 2015 1:19 pm

As mentioned, it's 70s technology.... geared towards grandma and grocery gettin'. Of course, the GTs and Sport versions got anti-sway bars.... but they're still 70s tech. Actually, late 60s tech (when they were developed).

Good enough for grandma.... check it out.
I actually enjoy driving my stock Vega (GT) in these hills and curves around the lake:
https://youtu.be/nRmaoh5MDyE
same road, different viewpoint: https://youtu.be/BzxccBNuPwo

Different road, camera under the car focused on the lower control arm/balljoint.
https://youtu.be/DASzjKBueAc
if you look at the anti-swaybar bushings in the upper left corner, you can see that poly bushings in there would help a lot.

Just for giggles, check out same road but in a 1960 VW Bug..... you wanna talk about bad handling? Love that H-body. (eventhough my '60 Bug has more power than any stock H-body).
https://youtu.be/JqJsFmZI8ho
Dwight

'72 Vega GT Kammback, 215 V8
'73 Vega Wagon - Currently in Limbo....
My rides: http://www.cardomain.com/id/bugdewde
User avatar
bugdewde
 
Posts: 2124
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 7:08 pm
Location: East Tennessee

1972 Chevrolet Vega Kammback GT

Re: Why?

Postby EVL VEGA » Fri Nov 20, 2015 2:19 pm

Because i have a heavy v-8 in a little car and have no front sway bar? At least it goes straight really well.
EVL VEGA
'73 Vega Hatchback (former Super Gas car)
406 SBC, AFR 210 Eliminator Heads, 9:1 comp, pump gas, 328RWHP/412RWTQ (old heads, no N2O 1/17/04), 6.86 @ 100.8 in 1/8th (No N20 9/4/16), Mike's Trans TH400 (reverse manual), 5000 stall, 12 bolt, 35 spline strange axles, 4.33 gears, spool, hipster transbrake, linelock, backhalved, Alston 3 link, 100 shot NX Hitman+ kit, LC1 Wideband sensor, 31x18.5 MT Sportsman Pros, "Plum Ugly"™ Purple paint.
"Pound to fit..paint to match"
Image
User avatar
EVL VEGA
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 6:31 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

1973 Chevrolet Vega


Return to Suspension, Steering, & Brakes Tech

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests