I think we are up to 24 cents! lol. I think going with a little more lift is probably a good idea. The 327 is a different animal than the 350. The cylinder filling dynamics are different. The 327 should respond better with a less hot cam at higher RPM because the piston speed is more consistant than the 350. Because of this the 350 runs out of flame front sooner than the 327 so the heads need to be optimized differently. The 327 doesn't need as much relative port volume per RPM than the 350. The 327 will have more grace for poorly designed ports and will respond better to smaller ports than the 350, and will not respond well to large ports.
On the cam: the 327 will be grumpier with earlier exhaust opening than the 350. It doesn't need as 'hot' a cam as the 350 to make the same relative power.
I thought your idea of splitting the plennum on the tunnel ram was a good one. You can get away with the bigger carbs at lower RPM. You're right about the ram. It should actually increase lower RPM torque for the 327 It needs more lower air speed enertia than the 350 because the piston speed at and around TDC is slower. The 350 makes better low RPM vacuum and doesn't need the low speed enertia.
THis is a fun thread!